Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Clervrain et al v. Gruters et al
as 3:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Roode A. Clervrain, Francis Osei-Fosu and others
Defendant:
Joe Gruters, Mike Arnold, Mike Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS et al v. COPE et al
as 7:2020cv00014
Defendant:
BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE DEWEY, BROOKS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
TEMIRIA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mizelle v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Mayor Hardy Davis, LPN Teresa Leslie, LPN Alisha Turvey and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Mizelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Ivey et al
as 5:2019cv00776
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue, Kay Ivey and Vernon Barnett
Plaintiff:
Max S Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Mayor Hardy Davis, LPN Teresa Leslie, LPN Alisha Turvey and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00219
Defendant:
Mayor Hardy Davis, Rochelle Larry, Eunice Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cope v. Montgomery County Commission et al
as 5:2018cv01501
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue, Steve Marshall, John Merrill and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cope v. Hancock et al
as 5:2018cv00552
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Defendant:
Daniel Hancock, Wolfe Jones Hancock Daniel & South LLC, Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv20448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
