Cases 91 - 100 of 174
Young v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
James R. Young
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Grimmett v. Regan et al
as 4:2013cv01845
Plaintiff:
Keno Grimmett
Defendant:
Regan, Leak, Clifton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Harriss et al
as 4:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alvin Randy Pierce
Defendant:
Sheriff Jimmy Harriss, Chief Jailer Matt Martin, Deputy Chief Jailer Tiffany Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcolia Pierce v. Melanie Hasty, et al
as 13-14021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE HASTY and TRAVIS WILLIAMS
PIERCE v. Prine et al
as 7:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
Chris Prine and UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. HASTY et al
as 7:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
ARCOLIA CASTILLO PIERCE
Defendant:
MELANIE HASTY and Travis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2013cv01542
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Pierce
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Romey v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv03576
Plaintiff:
Abraham Romey
Defendant:
Williams, Pierce and Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01470
Petitioner:
Marco Dewayne Pierce
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Pierce v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-13998
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
