Cases 91 - 100 of 521
Beaubrun v. Gwinnett County Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv03168
Plaintiff:
Thony Beaubrun
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police Department, Brett West, Jonathan Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. PALMER et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON WHITE, JR
Defendant:
SGT GABRIEL PALMER, D O LANELY, D O WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIARRA v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2021cv00112
Petitioner:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, JUDY FITZGERALD, BATTLE WEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GEO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv00856
Defendant:
DAVIS, GEO CORPORATION, EASTRIDE and others
Plaintiff:
KAVIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hylton v. Eubanks et al
as 9:2021cv81069
Defendant:
Terrance Jones, Transport Deputy, Deputy Eubanks and others
Plaintiff:
Maliik N. Hylton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Pitts et al
as 2:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Mike Anthony Pitts, FNU Vitali, Stephen West and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Hiscock et al
as 2:2021cv00429
Defendant:
Stephen West and Manuela Hiscock
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Georgia Regional Hospital of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv01968
Defendant:
Devon Simpson, Commissioner Judy Fitzgerald, C. Rodney and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Attorney General Trump Admin et al
as 5:2021cv00235
Defendant:
A.W. Graphton, FNU Lee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David S.L. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00374
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jason D. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
