Cases 111 - 120 of 1,782
Hillman v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jockue H. Hillman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, E. A. Anderson and Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. BYS et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
CRAIG INNES LEE
Defendant:
STEPHANY BYS, H MITCHELL and CELESTE RUTLEGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Aramark, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
Aramark, LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and H. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Morse et al
as 4:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Randal Lamar Richardson
Defendant:
John E. Morse, Timothy Walmsley, Shaleena Cook Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neil Walker v. Michael Crespi, et al
as 22-13872
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CRESPI, FRANCES H. SMITH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Dunkle v. Carmack et al
as 8:2022cv02497
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Dunkle
Defendant:
N. Carmack, C. M. Fraccica, A. Sievers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Teems et al
as 3:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Miller
Defendant:
Cameron Teems, John Godwin, Michelle Nipper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
