Cases 111 - 120 of 157,316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fuentes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21868
Petitioner:
Teobaldo Fuentes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
Darrell Glenn King
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Joseph
as 6:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jean Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Mott et al
as 5:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Raymond D Grant
Defendant:
Carmelina Mott and Centurian of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 1:2024cv02124
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramey v. White County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Danny Dewayne Ramey
Defendant:
White County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bois, Reginald P. v. Olivares et al
as 1:2024cv21883
Plaintiff:
Reginald Petit Bois
Defendant:
A. Olivares and Chief Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rabold v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Brevard County)
as 6:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
Joshua-Wayne Rabold
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02121
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
