Cases 131 - 140 of 210
Southall v. Washburn et al
as 5:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Southall
Defendant:
FNU Washburn, FNU Colon, FNU Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, M. Colon and H. Coulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Jiminez et al
as 9:2015cv81206
Plaintiff:
Hector Lee Colon
Defendant:
Carey Jiminez and Scott Kozakoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv01935
Petitioner:
Jose Raymond Colon
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer v. Citrus County Detention Facility, et al.
as 5:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Samuel Palmer
Defendant:
Citrus County Detention Facility, Loretta Keller, Russell Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levine v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv22136
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Levine
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Jose Colon, J. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacoby v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brent Jacoby
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kim Jones, Cpt. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Osceola County Department of Corrections
as 6:2015cv00857
Plaintiff:
Abraham Eli Colon
Defendant:
Osceola County and County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSADO-PEREZ v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC
as 4:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ROSADO-PEREZ
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L CARRERO-RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDDLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al
as 4:2015cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT N RIDDLE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, JULIA JONES, J SOREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
