Cases 131 - 140 of 22,890
Collins v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerrod Collins
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Somerville v. Limestone County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Fred Somerville
Defendant:
Limestone County Sheriffs Department, Mike Blakely and Joey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kimberley
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Isaac Jerome Smith
Respondent:
M. Kimberley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Angela Johnson
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mensah v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Deborah Mensah
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08005
Petitioner:
Charles King, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
