Cases 161 - 170 of 157,862
Martin v. Warden, Orange County Corrections Department
as 6:2024cv01056
Petitioner:
Maria Navarro Martin
Respondent:
Warden, Orange County Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McDaniels v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome McDaniels
Defendant:
Seth Thompson, D. Duckwilder, Cenrioun Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Leon Moss
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat and Albernisha Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Swain et al
as 8:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Justin Wallace Bryant
Defendant:
Swain, Kennedy, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake Robinson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11889
Petitioner:
LAKE ROBINSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nagipejutawin v. Rome Georgia Police Department
as 24-11920
Plaintiff:
NAGIPEJUTAWIN, a.k.a. Julia Stanley
Defendant:
ROME GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Richard Harris v. Rosado, et al
as 24-11852
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
ROSADO, MOORE, MANNING and others
Daniel Dumond v. Miami Dade Police Department Kendall District, et al
as 24-11891
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT KENDALL DISTRICT, MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT MIDDLE EAST DISTRICT and MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
