Cases 11 - 20 of 3,088
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snipes v. Olson et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
Olson, C. Duenos, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fossett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2024cv00981
Petitioner:
Peter Fossett
Respondent:
Ashley B. Moody and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Masson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11004
Petitioner:
DANIEL B. MASSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Wallace, William v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2024cv14094
Plaintiff:
William J. Wallace
Defendant:
B. Stephenson and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
