Cases 11 - 20 of 387
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Torres et al
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Graham
Defendant:
Sindi Torres and Gregory Hardenfelder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
James Martin Graham
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRAHAM v. BERRY
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
JOHNNY L GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horsman v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Hon. John Doe, Hon. Tom Doe, Hon. Harry Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burriss v. Villegas et al
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss
Defendant:
Anthony Villegas, Jon Ossoff, Raphel Warnock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nepton v. Graham et al
as 0:2023cv61519
Plaintiff:
Javier Isaac Nepton
Defendant:
Amandaleigh Graham, Harold Pryor, Maria De La Guardia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
