Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dice v. Curry et al
as 3:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
David L. Dice, Jr.
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Angela B. Corey, Mike Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiss v. Blackmon
as 3:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charles Weiss
Defendant:
Blackmon, Haralson County Detention Center, Eddie Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haig v. Price et al
as 2:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
Ericross Zander Haig
Defendant:
William Price, Brian Lee Masony, Jacques Lamour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Champion et al
as 1:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger-D Prince
Defendant:
Jaqulyn Champion, Liz Roberts, Joy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Crowden et al
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard Jeptha Ellis
Defendant:
FNU Crowden, Jane or John Doe and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis v. CXW, et al
as 16-11639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HOPE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, PEGGY ANN COOPER, Assistant Warden, JANE OR JOHN DOE and others
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Bowden et al
as 8:2015cv01211
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Toni Bowden, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Hardee Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
