Cases 11 - 20 of 33
HOWARTH v. JONES
as 5:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD HOWARTH
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Calhoun v. Daniels
as 1:2015cv00231
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Lee Posey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Larry v. Mercer et al
as 4:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Julius James Larry, IV
Defendant:
Raymond Mercer, Everett Ragan, City of Savannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 14-15025
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
EDWARDS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2014cv00549
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv01233
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clements v. Medlin
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Clements
Respondent:
Jason Medlin and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00741
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howarth v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00353
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Howarth
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
