Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
D.O. P MILLS, SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, MAJOR BROCK and others
Plaintiff:
VENSON JONES, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Tanner et al
as 5:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Ofc. John Spears, Terry Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Loren D. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent:
Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Owens, et al
as 3:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Terry E. Barnard, William Curry, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WRIGHT v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00427
Defendant:
SABRINA SMITH, BRIAN OWENS, BRAXTON T COTTON and others
Plaintiff:
TERRIUS WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
