Cases 11 - 20 of 290
ROBERTSON v. MILLER et al
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
ALVIN CHASE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
BRETT MILLER, CHRISTOPE MCLAINE, ALICIA HUGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
ROY ALLEN NICHOLS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nichols v. JPay Incorporated LLC
as 1:2023cv20797
Plaintiff:
Steven Nichols
Defendant:
JPay Incorporated LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Okwor v. Broward County, Florida et al
as 0:2023cv60107
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Okwor
Defendant:
Broward County, Florida, Alan Danz, Josh Danz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Scandett et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Marlon Green
Defendant:
Warden Reginald Scandett, State of Georgia, Henry County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyree Ford v. Kevin Karnes, et al
as 22-14311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KARNES, NOELLE BRAMMIND, ROBERT NICHOLS and others
Nichols v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2022cv00638
Petitioner:
Donald Nichols
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berger v. Baptiest et al
as 3:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jackie Berger
Defendant:
John Baptiest, R. Bassa, Centurion Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Karnes et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Kevin Karnes, Noelle Brammind, Robert Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. HUDGINS et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
SAUNDRA L. WHITE and SAUNDRA L WHITE
Respondent:
HUDGINS, P. ADAMS, LORI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
