Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
OTIS CROSBY, JR
Defendant:
MICHELLE DANIELS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
OTIS HILL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, UNIT MANAGER KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Centurion of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Otis Crosby, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, Michelle Daniels, Sgt. Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Hunter
Respondent:
Matthew Wade and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. B.C.O. Rivers
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams
Defendant:
B.C.O. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
