Cases 11 - 20 of 237
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
James Erwin
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department and OCSO Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Osceola County)
as 6:2023cv01342
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Ramos
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. RAMOS
as 3:2023cv15676
Plaintiff:
MARCEL A WRIGHT
Defendant:
I RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Camacho Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Lyons v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
James E Lyons
Defendant:
Billy Woods, Anna Marie Macafee, Alisha Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
