Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Grant v. Lucas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Lucas, Officer Huffman, Officer Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. City of Montgomery (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis Washington
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Montgomery Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dewhart v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis Dewhart
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and W. R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughley v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Willie R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keith Tolbert
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Willie R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooks v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv01057
Plaintiff:
Edward Cooks
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Bobby Bright and Warden Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sankey v. Bright et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01029
Plaintiff:
Adrian Sankey
Defendant:
Bobby Bright, Warden Collins, Dr. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarrett v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00911
Plaintiff:
Stanley T. Jarrett
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Warden Collins, Warden Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
James A. Stephens, III
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, W. R. Collins and M. E. Brantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.