Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Cornell McKenzie v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I, et al
as 10-14943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL AUGUSTUS MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN, RAY HOLT, HARRELL WATTS and others
Noe v. Transfer Agent No. 1 et al
as 2:2009cv01725
Plaintiff:
Woodburck Noe
Defendant:
Transfer Agent No. 1, Richard Allen, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagnes v. Abele et al
as 1:2009cv01258
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fagnes
Defendant:
Mary Lee Abele, O. H. Florence, William (Bill) Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2009cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles T Phillips
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, Troy King and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FAILS v. DANIELS, et al
as 4:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FAILS
Defendant:
NANCY DANIELS, JAMIE SPIVEY and ALICE FAYE HARISE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ivory v. Robinson et al
as 2:2008cv02307
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Ivory, .
Defendant:
Harold D Robinson, Fred S Gasbarro, Robert P Barclift and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. Pitman et al
as 4:2008cv01560
Plaintiff:
Mateo Perez Perez
Defendant:
Bryan S. Pitman, Alice Martin, Steven T Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FAILS v. HARISE
as 3:2008cv00535
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FAILS
Defendant:
ALICE FAYE HARISE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henley v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2008cv01508
Plaintiff:
Roy Kenneth Henley
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Alice Mitchell and Freddy Butler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. Pitman et al
as 4:2008cv01375
Petitioner:
Mateo Perez Perez
Respondent:
Bryan S. Pitman, Alice Martin, Benny Womack and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
