Cases 21 - 30 of 3,099
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perpinan, Alberto A. v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv21769
Plaintiff:
Alberto Abdel Perpinan
Defendant:
Asharell Jenkins, J. Dominguez, Mantencon R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVANTS v. MANN et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS AVANTS and DEMETRIS AVANTS
Defendant:
C MANN, B BENTON, BUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier, Kelvin v. McKuhen et al
as 2:2024cv14079
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
J. G. McKuhen, Colonel B. Stephenson, R. Byner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
