Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Fuentes v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00941
Defendant:
Renninger, William Post, W. A. Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandris Rosales Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORKER v. DEMPSEY et al
as 4:2019cv00385
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CORKER
Defendant:
BRITTNEY FOX, ELIZABETH VALLEJO, DARLENE RAWLINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales Fuentes v. Jones, et al.
as 3:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Lt. J. Ragans, Lt. Linbrin, Captain Power and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandris Rosales Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00872
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Bert Christopher Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Bowers et al
as 5:2019cv00133
Defendant:
FNU Bowers, Jason Hunt, Billy Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2018cv02126
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Darryl Donnell Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bower v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 5:2018cv00354
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Karl Henry Bower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00286
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Julie Jones, FNU Riedl, FNU Southerland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Woods et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Albert Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
Walter Woods, Juliana Dodd, Warden Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. RDAP-BOP et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2017cv00767
Plaintiff:
Albert Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
RDAP-BOP , M. Laguna , Warden Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
