Cases 21 - 30 of 643
Madison v. Barnard et al
as 1:2020cv03923
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, James W. Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Madison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Adams et al
as 4:2020cv00148
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Derrick Nesbitt
Respondent:
Robert Adams, Jr., Brian Owens and Terry Barnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RICK JACOBS, VICE CHAIRMAN BRIAN OWENS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Owens et al
as 3:2019cv00063
Defendant:
William Curry and Brian Owens
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Tanner et al
as 5:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Ofc. John Spears, Terry Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Loren D. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbreath v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2019cv03303
Defendant:
Brian Owens and Jay C. Stephenson
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Culbreath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBBINS v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 5:2014cv00134
Defendant:
ENDRES, SPEIGHTS, RODNEY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
