Cases 21 - 30 of 393
Serrano Naranjo v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 0:2020cv62192
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Daniley Serrano Naranjo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00732
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
London v. Miami Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2020cv23770
Plaintiff:
Rodney F. London
Defendant:
Miami Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Giron v. Trump et al
as 4:2020cv01322
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kaylan v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2020cv01030
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Ahlain Saing Kaylan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. lmmigration Custom Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv23358
Plaintiff:
Corey Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Jorge Pereira, lmmigration Custom Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radetic v. Miami Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2020cv23783
Defendant:
Miami Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Radetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cayunda v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2020cv22598
Plaintiff:
Clovis Cortez Cayunda
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary D.H.S. and Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Immigration Custom Enforcement
as 1:2020cv22388
Plaintiff:
Jean A. Thomas
Defendant:
Immigration Custom Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vasallo Aguila v. Bureau of Immigration and Custom Enforcement
as 0:2020cv61200
Defendant:
Bureau of Immigration and Custom Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Ada Rosa Vasallo Aguila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
