Cases 21 - 30 of 585
DOVE, et al v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE, MASON DEAN and RONALD GLEEN RICE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Gosnell et al
as 3:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. M. Gosnell, V. Hazel, Sergeant Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. GEORGIA et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR and BRICKS
Defendant:
State of Georgia, CAPTAIN ULM and TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Corian Jones
Defendant:
T. Lamb, D. Allen, K. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Dean v. John Doe, et al
as 23-12433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, FNU TIDWELL and others
Dean Aubol v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12355
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEAN FRANCIS AUBOL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
BURTCH v. GEORGIA et al
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR and BRICKS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, CAPTAIN ULM and TARA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Defendant:
Allen Dean, Matthew Wade, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14137
Plaintiff:
Toby Dean Chapman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
