Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Clark v. Warden
as 4:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Clark
Defendant:
Warden, Gordon County Jail and Mitch Raulston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Fulton County District Attorney's Office
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Rubin Gordon and Rubin Jamel Gordon
Defendant:
Fulton County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03102
Petitioner:
Merease Gordon
Respondent:
Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Chatham County Sheriff Dept
as 4:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Chatham County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02949
Petitioner:
Nigel Marc Gordon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Vlasenko et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Sieem Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Artyom Vlasenko, LPN Shelva Harin, Shawn Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hibbett v. Gordon County Sheriff's Department, GA
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Lazarus Samuell Hibbett
Defendant:
Gordon County Sheriff's Department, GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Gordon D'Andre Cohns
Defendant:
John T. Wilcher and Shalena Cook Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gordon D'Andre Cohns
Defendant:
John Wilcher, Charles V. Loncon and Chester A. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohns v. Wilcher
as 4:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Gordon Cohns
Respondent:
John Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
