Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Rutledge v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00803
Plaintiff:
Roy Murphy Rutledge
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Brooks et al
as 7:2014cv01119
Plaintiff:
Charles Tate
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Mark A Brooks, Tony K Temple, Orlando Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
George Rutledge
Defendant:
William Bell, A.C. Roper, Cathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Strange (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Louis Rutledge
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett v. Butler et al
as 7:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
Leon Pickett
Defendant:
Butler, Kim Thomas, John Hutton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horn v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv01429
Plaintiff:
Bobby Daryl Horn
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, John Hutton, Rutledge and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Donesky Brown
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv01378
Plaintiff:
James Bailey
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, John Hutton, Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Hutton et al
as 7:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Rufus Ricks, Jr.
Defendant:
John Hutton, ICS Workers, Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satcher v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv03652
Plaintiff:
Raydrekous Satcher
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, James Hutton, K. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
