Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv01926
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Sessions et al
as 1:2017cv01771
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, J.C. Holland, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ison v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 1:2016cv01433
Petitioner:
Paul Ison
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dowdy v. Couch et al
as 2:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dowdy
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Marcus Neville, B. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Shelby County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2013cv02137
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Guy Young
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Chief Jailer and US Marshals Office
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Cartman v. USP Atlanta Warden, et al
as 13-10747
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY VINCENT CARTMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN and US MARSHALL SERVICE
Brewer v. Sheriff et al
as 6:2012cv01627
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brewer
Defendant:
Sheriff, Seminole County Jail, US Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedingfield v. Bradley et al
as 5:2012cv03474
Plaintiff:
Alton Bedingfield
Defendant:
Leon Bradley and US Marshals
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lloyd v. U.S. Marshals Office Middle Di, et al
as 12-12343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK MYRON LLOYD, a.k.a. Rashad Abdul Hamid
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALS OFFICE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, BREWER, US Marshals Office Middle District of Montgomery, Alabama and JESSE SEROYER, JR.
Harsh Sharma v. Jupina, et al
as 10-15612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSH SHARMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUPINA, LEE COUNTY JAIL, LEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
