Cases 21 - 30 of 1,625
Smith v. Department of Correction et al
as 6:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Department of Correction, CO Walker and Morning Shift at CFRC Orlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Walker et al
as 8:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
FNU Walker and FNU Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Murray et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Antonio Swain
Defendant:
Billy Murray, Brown, Phillip Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
