Cases 31 - 40 of 812
Byrd v. Valles et al
as 0:2023cv61362
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Byrd
Defendant:
Daniel B. Valles, Leonard E. Diaz, Ronald Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
STODDARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv14053
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A STODDARD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STODDARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A STODDARD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoddard v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Stoddard
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jerome Russell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Russell v. State of Alabama
as 5:2023cv00619
Petitioner:
Edward H Russell
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Russell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11502
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADRIAN L. RUSSELL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewitt v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Russell Hewitt
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
