Cases 31 - 40 of 309
Curry v. United States of America
as 9:2022cv80870
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Donte Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dohm v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Petitioner:
Stephen D. Dohm
Respondent:
Mrs. Curry and Det. Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HERRING et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
WADE W HERRING, III and ALISON L CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOHM v. CURRY et al
as 4:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN D DOHM
Defendant:
CURRY and MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuce v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Fuce, Sr.
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Sheriff Mike Willams, Armor Correctional Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Donell Curry
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Reform Alabama City Police Department, Pickens County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURZIKE v. SPEAR et al
as 3:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
SPEAR, CARR, NURSE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Lenny Curry et al.
as 3:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
