Cases 31 - 40 of 341
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Melbourne Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Melbourne Police Department, Alexis Harrison, Maurizio Ivervosi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Harrison v. USA
as 22-13697
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harrison v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Jermaine Lavan Harrison
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HARRISON v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HARRISON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. McGee et al
as 2:2022cv14312
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Harrison
Defendant:
Beau McGee and US Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pelletier v. Melbourne Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv01593
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Melbourne Police Department, Alexis Harrison, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Whittle
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Timothy Vaughn, Kelli Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01406
Petitioner:
Michael David Harrison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
