Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Gonzalez-Azuaje v. Wood et al
as 5:2020cv00070
Petitioner:
Leonardo Enrique Gonzalez Azuaje
Respondent:
Officer Wood, Mr. Wright and Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
Ali v. DHS/ICE/Dept. of Justice
as 4:2020cv00852
Petitioner:
Ilyas Ali
Respondent:
DHS/ICE/Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Gregory et al
as 0:2020cv60677
Defendant:
Immigration Naturalization Services, ICE, Sheriff Tony Gregory, Captain J Acosta and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thelemaque v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2020cv20467
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Assistant Field Office Director of Krome SPC, Director of the ICE Field Office and others
Plaintiff:
Wilby Thelemaque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruiz Hernandez v. Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
as 2:2020cv14071
Defendant:
Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
Plaintiff:
Henry Adonias Ruiz Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2020cv20605
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Jumoke Dixon
Defendant:
Secretary of The Department of Homeland Security, Assistant Field Office Director for Krome SPC, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dubon v. Donahue et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Petitioner:
Vidal Garcia Dubon
Respondent:
Damian Streetz, Michael J. Donahue and ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aceituno v. Harrison Police Dept. et al
as 4:2019cv01758
Respondent:
ICE, Harrison Police Dept., Immigration Court and others
Petitioner:
Dario Aceituno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnett v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2019cv10207
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS, Director of the ICE Field Office, Warden of Monroe County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Kohan Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
