Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00309
Petitioner:
. Norris Williams and Norris Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Norris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Putnam County)
as 3:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Stonie Shane Norris
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Florida
as 2:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Norris Williams
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Florida
as 2:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Norris Williams
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00940
Petitioner:
Stonie Shane Norris
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. NORRIS
as 3:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
TAJHON WILSON
Defendant:
S NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. USA
as 1:2021cv00268
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Dwayne Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NORRIS v. STEARNS et al
as 3:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
TROY LAMAR NORRIS
Defendant:
STEARNS, EMPLOYEE DC271 and K YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
