Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Culver v. Valenza et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00769
Plaintiff:
Victor Jandell Culver
Defendant:
Austin Arnold, Greg Lee, Angelica Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPURLOCK v. BURNHAM et al
as 3:2019cv03592
Defendant:
JAMES D BURNHAM and UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SPURLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. Cook et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00856
Defendant:
Lyn Head, Dwayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker and others
Plaintiff:
James Beauford Lamb, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Hart v. Julie Jones, et al
as 17-15168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY A. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE JONES, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY KNOX and others
Hart v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Florida Department of Corrections, Gregory Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackie Shivers, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-12493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MACKIE L. SHIVERS, JR., a.k.a. Mackie L. Shivers, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DALE GRAFTON, Unit Manager, USP Coleman 2, T. ANTHONY, Counselor, USP Coleman 2 and others
Dean v. Jones, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Ventress Correctional Facility, E. Laster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shivers v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Mackie Shivers
Defendant:
United States of America, Dale Grafton, T. Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baptiste v. Barker et al
as 5:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Yonel Jean Baptiste
Defendant:
M. Barker and C. Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
