Cases 41 - 50 of 899
Howell v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Derrick Lashon Howell
Respondent:
Melissa Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2023cv21272
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DESHUN ROBERTS
Defendant:
J WILLIAMS and S WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Klucznik et al
as 8:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thomas Lawrence
Defendant:
Major Shaun Klucznik, Captain Andy Batchelder, Lieutenant Daniel Carriveau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Laman
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant:
David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Knight et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Sgt. Knight, Derrick Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eutsey v. Davis et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Derrick Eutsey
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Davis and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
ALLEN v. SANCHEZ et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
S SANCHEZ, MAZINGO, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. McLagulhin et al
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Derrick Carroll
Defendant:
Josh McLagulhin and Tammy Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SUMPTER et al
as 3:2023cv09073
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
KENNETH SUMPTER, DERRICK PURVIS and LARRY MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
