Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Hankins v. Anderson
as 0:2012cv61331
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bernard Hanking, Sr
Defendant:
Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Jolly et al
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Billy Nelson Hammock
Defendant:
Sheryl B. Jolly, Peter D. Johnson, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Hanks v. State of Florida, et al
as 11-13063
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH SHAWN HANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hammock v. Hulsey et al
as 1:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Lynda Sewell Hulsey, Hank Syms and Deana C. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettencourt v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00165
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Marty Allen, Benjie Nobles and others
Plaintiff:
Paul George Bettencourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettencourt v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Paul George Bettencourt
Defendant:
Brian Owens, John Doe, Marty Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Riches v. Senate Banking Committee, et al
as 10-13966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE, ALI VELSHI, HENRY PAULSON, HANK and others
Jonathan Riches v. Senate Banking Committee, et al
as 10-13231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d.b.a. Gordon Gekko
Defendant - Appellee:
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE, ALI VELSHI, HENRY PAULSON, Hank and others
:
RAYMOND LAMB and CHARLES KEATING
Peterson v. Wong et al
as 6:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerome Peterson
Defendant:
Hank Wong, Timothy Kuzma, Richard Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Teton County, Hank Phibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
