Cases 41 - 50 of 445
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 3:2022cv18500
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JOHNSON JR and ALBERT JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
K KNIGHT and L HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. MACON STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
ARMOND GIBSON
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN TARMASHE SMITH, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. Lake County et al
as 5:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
Lake County, Peyton C. Grinell, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 3:2022cv17329
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM KNIGHT
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Cotton v. Cooper, et al
as 22-12927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY COTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
COOPER, KNIGHT, WALKER and others
Montalban v. Rivera et al
as 5:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jose Montalban
Defendant:
FNU Rivera, United States of America and FNU Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SMITH, WARDEN MCKENZIE, UNIT MANAGER KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
OTIS HILL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, UNIT MANAGER KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv22165
Plaintiff:
Raqwan Mobley
Defendant:
M. Kelly, Ruben Williams, Stephen Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
