Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Smola v. Ogaga
as 8:2019cv02938
Plaintiff: Joshua Lee Smola
Defendant: Hillsborough County Sheriff Office, Naphcare Medical Department, Ogaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cozart v. NaphCare et al
as 1:2019cv04970
Defendant: NaphCare and Theodore Jackson
Plaintiff: Calib Cozart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oryang v. Mitchum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01615
Defendant: Alabama Dept of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wray v. Naphcare et al
as 8:2019cv01434
Defendant: Naphcare and Psychological Services
Plaintiff: James A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubblefield v. Medical Director for Naphcare Medical et al
as 1:2019cv02226
Defendant: Officer Alston, Dr. Christine Jimenez and Medical Director for Naphcare Medical
Plaintiff: Marc Stubblefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. Tavernier et al
as 8:2019cv00515
Defendant: Tampa Police Department, NaphCare Corporation, Inc., Matthew Klimkoski and others
Plaintiff: Calvin Dorsey Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. NaphCare Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00108
Defendant: Connie Young, J. Battle, M. Conga and others
Plaintiff: Curtis Wayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boeji v. Naphcare Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03080
Plaintiff: Edward Gordon Boeji
Defendant: Naphcare Inc. and D. Luscznski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. NaphCare Corporation
as 8:2018mc00103
Plaintiff: Curtis Wayne Brown
Defendant: NaphCare Corporation
Drinkard v. Onderdonk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00450
Defendant: Ms. Wise, Sgt. Turner, Corporal D. Jones and others
Plaintiff: Napoleon Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?