Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Colomb v. James et al
as 1:2020cv00438
Plaintiff:
James Mathew Colomb
Defendant:
Gordon McCaren Morrison, Frederick Michael Beckers, DeKalb County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Daniels et al
as 1:2019cv05142
Defendant:
Officer Quindary Pitts and Officer Pokey Daniels
Plaintiff:
Larance D. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Covington, GA, Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04626
Defendant:
Pokey Daniels, Superior Court - Newton County Georgia, Q. Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Brianna C. Horton and LaRance D. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al(Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv00932
Petitioner:
Charles Pitts
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Cruz et al
as 4:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Shannon G. Wallace, Holly Varner and Christian Cruz
Plaintiff:
Ryan Craig Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Cruz et al
as 1:2019cv01387
Defendant:
Shannon G. Wallace, Holly Varner and Christian Cruz
Plaintiff:
Ryan Craig Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Bullard et al
as 1:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Captain Regina Bolar, Warden Mitchell, Lieutenant Ashley Kidd and others
Plaintiff:
James Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00280
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LATOYA MASSEY and CONNIE F PITTS
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Theodore "Ted" Jackson
as 1:2018cv02755
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson, Markle, Paul L. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory Pitts v. USA
as 18-12096
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVORY PITTS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
