Cases 51 - 60 of 1,727
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massard v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv81228
Plaintiff:
Christian Massard
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Geo Care, Sgt. Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOYOLA v. CHUTKAN et al
as 2:2023cv14300
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL LOYOLA
Defendant:
TANA CHUTKAN, Ron DeSantis, MOISHE MANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornell Louis v. State of Florida, Department of Corrections
as 8:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Cornell Louis
Defendant:
State of Florida, Department of Corrections, Daryl Cavangaro, Matt Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin v. Smith
as 2:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Ja'Kie Benjamin
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv23138
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Parks
Defendant:
Mathew Smith, Mohave County Arizona and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPEAR v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEE SPEAR
Defendant:
SMITH, DEANTE M MCMILLIAN, LEON FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
William B. Blitch, Bayron, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lott et al
as 2:2023cv14246
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Shavon Smith, III
Defendant:
J. Lott, Lieutenant Ritenour and Highlands County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Alex Knight
Defendant:
C. C. Smith and J. J. Fraddosio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
