Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Wood v. Bibb Correctional et al
as 7:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wood
Defendant:
Bibb Correctional and Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bessemer, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2015cv02371
Plaintiff:
Latunja Johnson
Defendant:
Bessemer, Alabama, City of , Nathaniel Rutledge, Jr. , Karrie Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv02114
Petitioner:
Odell Rutledge
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rutledge v. Hays State Prison Department of Correction et al
as 4:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
George Rutledge
Defendant:
Hays State Prison Department of Correction and Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguz Williams v. Robert Rutledge, et al
as 15-14308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRIGUZ DASHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT RUTLEDGE, ORLANDO WALKER and ANN FULGHMAN
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Thomas et al
as 7:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brown
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, John Hutton and Robert Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Rutledge et al
as 7:2015cv01242
Plaintiff:
Rodriguz DaShawn Williams
Defendant:
Robert Rutledge, Orlando Walker and Ann Fulgham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Thomas et al
as 7:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
James Charley Moon
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Reosha Butlar, John Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinson v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brinson
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Michael Crews, FNU Munnerlyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
