Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 586
DONNELL v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LEE DONNELL
Defendant: JORDAN and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnell v. Jordan et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: Michael Lee Donnell
Defendant: Mrs. Jordan and GA Diagnostic and Classification Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Nassau County Jail
as 3:2022cv01425
Plaintiff: John S. Jordan
Defendant: Nassau County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon McLean v. Peterkin, et al
as 22-14284
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON P. MCLEAN
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT PETERKIN and SERGENT JORDAN
HUNTER v. BEASLEY
as 7:2022cv00144
Plaintiff: JORDAN HUNTER
Defendant: Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. Prumell et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff: Timothy Joseph Mace
Defendant: Sheriff Bill Prumell, Jennifer Jordan, Poulton Tamantha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONEY v. SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 1:2022cv00169
Petitioner: JORDAN KEESHAN CONEY
Respondent: SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hightower v. Putnam County et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Hightower, Jr.
Defendant: Putnam County, Gator Deloach, Mattew Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLean v. Peterkin et al
as 6:2022cv01657
Plaintiff: Brandon P. McLean
Defendant: Lieutenant Peterkin and Sergent Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Cotton v. Cooper, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-12927
Plaintiff / Appellant: LARRY COTTON
Defendant / Appellee: COOPER, KNIGHT, WALKER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?