Cases 61 - 70 of 390
Diaz v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1
as 5:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
Abel Diaz
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tucker v. Diaz-Delgado et al
as 6:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Renwick L. Tucker
Defendant:
Karlos Diaz-Delgado and Wayne Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Germaine Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Sousa Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. The GEO Group Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv80403
Plaintiff:
Emilio Diaz and Emilo Diaz
Defendant:
The GEO Group Inc., South Bay C.F. Medical Dept. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Pabon v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Diaz-Pabon and Osvaldo Diaz Pabon
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Roy C. Cheatham, Kathy P. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donohoe v. Prummell et al
as 2:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
Dillon David Donohoe
Defendant:
William Prummell, Joseph Osinga, FNU Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Lopez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv22315
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Annarys Diaz-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DIAZ-MEDINA v. JOSEPH
as 3:2021cv00796
Petitioner:
JOSE DIAZ-MEDINA
Respondent:
M V JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. Polk County Florida et al
as 8:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
Polk County South Jail, Polk County Sheriff Office and Polk County Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
