Cases 61 - 70 of 442
KNIGHT v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
PAUL EMMANUEL KNIGHT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Carter et al
as 7:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Reed Max Knight
Respondent:
Karen Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Berman et al
as 5:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
M. Berman, James Pappas, Kristie Mathieu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sigers v. Dunn et al
as 1:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
Emmett Junior Stigers, III and Emmett Junior Sigers, III
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, R. Butler, Captain Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR HUMPHREY
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT, SERGEANT RONNESHA TULLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Jenkins et al
as 8:2021cv02762
Defendant:
Sergeant Wagner, Sergeant Hallian, Major S. Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamar Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heagney v. Knight et al
as 8:2021cv02713
Plaintiff:
William R. Heagney
Defendant:
Thomas Knight, Kurt Hoffman, Brandon Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bateman v. Cone et al
as 2:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Nathan Parke Bateman
Defendant:
Matt Cone, Wayne Knight, Samuel Ebeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Harden et al
as 6:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael Casey Thompson
Defendant:
FNU Harden, Officer FNU Ostic, Amanda Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Jacksonville Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen Knight
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff Office and Officer Blake Ortagus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
