Cases 61 - 70 of 741
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUWANNEE CI ANNEX WARDEN, ASST. WARDEN GOODWIN and others
Carroll v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv01443
Petitioner:
Morris Dewayne Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harris v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Warden Lane, Asst. Warden Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. GDC et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Duane Edwards Morris
Defendant:
GDC, Paulding RSAT, Monique Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goshay v. C.O.J. et al
as 3:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Erique Goshay
Defendant:
C.O.J. and Tammy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
STEVE A MORRIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, DIRECTOR WADE DAMRON and WILCOX STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
STEVE A MORRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. MAIL ROOM STAFF
as 5:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
STEVE A MORRIS
Defendant:
MAIL ROOM STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
