Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Leverett v. Roundtree
as 1:2013cv00096
Petitioner:
Kenneth Antwon Leverett
Respondent:
Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brewer v. Roundtree
as 1:2013cv00087
Petitioner:
Michael Lane Brewer
Respondent:
Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roundtree v. State of Georgia
as 6:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
Dontae Cartavis Roundtree
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bussard v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Robert Bussard
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Gene Johnson, Michael Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Terry et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Michelle Terry, Michael Rodgers and Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke v. Richmond County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Luke
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff's Department, Richard Roundtree, Chester Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gladden v. Bentley et al
as 5:2012cv02434
Plaintiff:
John Allen Gladden
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Luther Strange and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryll McKenzie v. Timothy Ford, et al
as 12-12961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYLL MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FORD, WILLIAM C. MOORE, JASON C. STEPHENS and others
Estrada v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Albert Estrada
Defendant:
Donald Davis, T. D. Anderson, Sgt. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrada v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Albert Estrada
Defendant:
Donald Davis, T.D. Anderson, Captain Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
