Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Heard v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Doyle L. Heard
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEARD v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
DOYLE L HEARD
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY B MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CHRISTOPHER GOLDEN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, TATIANA R SALVADOR, STEPHANIE W RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle Heard v. Governor, State of Florida, et al
as 23-10051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE L. HEARD
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR, STATE OF FLORIDA, MELINDA N. COONROD and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Curtis v. Collinsworth et al
as 6:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jessie Owen Curtis
Defendant:
Danielle Collinsworth, Mark Lambardi, Steve Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
