Cases 1 - 10 of 1,307
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
ADAM P RUNSDORF
Respondent:
PENSACOLA FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyrone Morgan v. Doctor Poorman, et al
as 24-11655
Plaintiff:
TYRONE M. MORGAN
Defendant:
DOCTOR POORMAN, ADAM PYLITT and FRANK MIGILIORE
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
