Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Norman Hampton
Defendant:
Deputy Warden L. Jones, President Juan H Allen, Heather Cartell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jamar Mann
Defendant:
J. Lindsey, Tomlin, S. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Heid v. Mark Rutkoski, et al
as 24-10068
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HEID
Defendant:
MARK RUTKOSKI and FORREST BEST
Hall v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Terique Hall
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Veronica Stewart, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. IRS Officer Harper et al
as 3:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jerald Gipson
Defendant:
IRS Officer Harper, Columbia Correctional Institution, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Willis et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes
Defendant:
Cpl Willis, Sgt. Baxter, Cpl. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Heid v. Forrest Best, et al
as 22-11792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH HEID
Defendant / Appellee:
FORREST BEST and MARK RUTKOSKI
Best v. Headley et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
Terry D Best and Terry Darray Best
Respondent:
Warden III Joseph H. Headley, Steve Marshall and Joseph H Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
