Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Luster v. Moussa et al
as 2:2024cv00628
Defendant:
Frederick Hink, Ramy Moussa, Christopher Mocci and others
Plaintiff:
Sammy Devontae Luster, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. WATSON et al
as 1:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
KEITH G PERRY
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLOVIS WATSON, JR, DETECTIVE TRAVIS E DEVINNY, DETECTIVE BEVERIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Barlow v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11988
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES BARLOW
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
ALLEN v. BENNEFIELD et al
as 4:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
JACOB B ALLEN
Defendant:
T BENNEFIELD, BARLOW, L K SWEARINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCPHEE v. BARLOW et al
as 3:2021cv00858
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, II, D BARLOW and JOHN DOE, I
Plaintiff:
RONALD RAE MCPHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2021cv61018
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'NEAL v. GREENE et al
as 3:2021cv00685
Defendant:
EVAN R MANNERS, MELINDA GRAY, JUSTIN P NEEL and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00352
Defendant:
Brandon Barlow, Gwendolyn Givens, Karla Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Rashad Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
