Cases 1 - 10 of 578
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorman, Bradley v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14155
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dorman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, J. Holtz and Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Ivey
as 6:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Steven Patrick Bradley
Respondent:
Warden, Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mark Bradley Boyd
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility, Wheeler Correctional Facility and Commissioner Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Mark Bradley Boyd
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOUSTON v. HAMLIN et al
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER HAMLIN and MAIL ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. USA
as 1:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Harlan Bradley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jermaine Harmon v. Anthony Rhodes, et al
as 23-13805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ALFONSO HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY W. RHODES, CODY BENSLAY, ERIC HENKEL and others
Tyre Bradley v. USA
as 23-13627
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYRE MARQUISE BRADLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOUSTON v. KING et al
as 5:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN TAVARES KING and LT KRAUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
